The muscle guarding problem
When you pull steadily on a spine, the paraspinal muscles contract to protect it. That reflex cancels much of the intended force, which is why static traction often produces a stretch sensation without changing pressure inside the disc.
Decompression tables cycle the load — a pull phase followed by a partial release, repeated across the session. The cycling stays below the reflex threshold, so the muscles never fully engage, and the disc genuinely unloads.
Targeting a specific disc level
An L5-S1 lesion, an L4-L5 lesion and a C5-C6 lesion each require a different pull angle. Decompression protocols set that angle from your MRI. A general traction bed pulls along one axis regardless of which disc is symptomatic, which is why results are inconsistent.
Questions that separate the two in 30 seconds
- Is the table computer-controlled with a force feedback loop?
- Which disc level is being targeted, and at what angle?
- Does the pull cycle, or is it a constant hold?
- Who reviewed the MRI before the settings were chosen?
- Is rehabilitation included, or is the table sold on its own?
Where traction still has a role
Manual and mechanical traction remain useful for facet-related stiffness, general mobility work and as a low-cost adjunct. The failure is using it as a substitute for decompression in a genuine contained disc lesion with radiating symptoms, and charging for the latter.
Neither works alone
Whatever the table, the disc reloads the moment you go back to the same chair, the same lifting mechanics and the same weak deep stabilisers. The clinical value comes from the sequence: unload, control inflammation, then rebuild.